I am reposting Kristen's brilliant insight from www.rageagainsttheminivan.com. Let's all enlist to fight this war!
If you watch the trends of media, whether it be print, internet, or
tv, you’ve probably noticed that every couple of months there is a new
version of the “mommy war” being played out. Last month’s battle du
jour was surrounding moms who work vs. moms who stay at home. Today, a
firestorm has ignited over a provocative photo and article in Time
magazine about extended breastfeeding and attachment parenting. These
manufactured mommy wars are predictable because they tend to provoke
strong reactions from mothers who feel judged, as well as mothers who
want to feel superior for their choices. A litany of analysis, outrage,
and defensiveness usually follows. Women tear each other down, while the
entity responsible for initiating the battle reaps the benefit (whether
it be a hot debate on a talk show or a political playing card). The
insecurities of women surrounding their parenting choices are frequently
pawns in the ratings game, and I think the most recent Time magazine
article and photo of a preschooler breastfeeding are intended to incite
such a reaction.
I don’t much care if you breastfed your kid
until they started kindergarten, or if you fed them formula from day
one. I don’t really care if you turned your infant car-seat
forward-facing prior to age 2, or if you homeschool, or if you send your
kids to daycare while you go to work. Do you cosleep? Did you
circumcise your son? I DON’T CARE. Do you babywear? Push your kid
around in a stroller? Use a leash for your kid at Disneyland?
Whatever. Good for you.
When it comes to issues of motherhood, there is one issue I care about: some kids don’t have one.
All of these petty wars about the choices of capable, loving mothers is
just a lot of white noise to me, Quite honestly, I’m often astonished
at the non-essential parenting issues I see moms getting their panties
in a wad about. Particularly when there are so many kids in this world
not being parented at all.
This is the only mommy war
I’ll wage. I’m confident that most mothers are doing the best that they
can for their kids, even if their choices are different than mine. I
think it’s ridiculous that so much energy is spent on debating largely
inconsequential parenting decisions when so very little attention is
given to the children who DON’T HAVE PARENTS. Why isn’t this causing
outrage? Making magazine covers? Inciting ranty twitter posts?
This
is the war I’ll be involved in: We, as a society, are not doing enough
to protect at-risk and motherless children, both in our country and
globally.
(Because apparently we’re too busy worrying about that kid whose mom gave him formula).
The kind of war I’ll get behind will advocate for kids with bigger issues than a mom who goes to work. Or doesn’t.
I’ll
get upset about the fact that LA County’s family court system is so
atrocious that they recently allowed press into court hearings for
minors, in the hopes that this might finally provide some accountability
for social workers who aren’t doing their job. Let me repeat that:
social workers are so understaffed and/or screwing up so badly that
reporters are allowed into confidential court proceedings in the hopes
that it will shape them up.
I’ll be disturbed by the 18-year-olds I regularly see on adoption photolistings
who, despite being old enough to live independently, place themselves
on national photolistings because they desperately want a mom and a dad
in their adult life. Because, in one teen’s words, he "wants to become a
member of a permanent family".
I’ll whine about how, when we
called our Christian agency about a healthy African American boy from LA
county who was in need of a home, we were told that they had no
prospective adoptive parents willing to accept a placement of a black
child. NOT ONE.
I’ll get my panties in a wad about a system that
requires foster children to be placed in an adoptive home for 6 months
before terminating parental rights, regardless of an absence of
reunification efforts by the birth parents. I’ll be angry about how this
scares away prospective adoptive parents, and hurts children by leaving
them in a limbo even after years of no contact or even abandonment by
their birth family. I’ll rant about how children whose parents have
failed them should be made legally freed for adoption AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE, so that more people would be willing to step forward and
adopt.
I’ll get behind complaining about how the government
renames orphans and calls them "wards of the state", and renames
orphanages and calls them "group homes", and how we collectively turn a
blind eye to the fact that we have hundreds of thousands of children
waiting for families in the US.
I’ll be appalled over how many
children around the world will age out of orphanages, due to lack of
paperwork or other factors that make them ineligible for adoption. I’ll
continue posting about the deplorable conditions of third world
orphanages, and the developmental challenges that neglected children
will face.
I’ll fight for the moms who don’t have access to
prenatal care, or for the moms who have to abandon their children
because of poverty. I’ll be mad that such inequities exist, and I’ll
support organizations that help change it.
The only mommy war I
support involves moms banding together to talk about the number of
children in our world who are missing out on basic human needs.
Security. Love. Affection. Let’s wage a war about that. Not everyone
can adopt, but we can all do something. Even if it’s just using our
voices for something more productive than personal parenting choices.
No comments:
Post a Comment